In 1996 the British Labour party announced in it’s election manifesto that it would hold a “Royal Commission of Inquiry” into Vivisection. As a result many animal rights groups backed Labour in the 1997 election.
Labour never initiated the Royal Commission, which outraged many, and today Tony Blair has come out and said that he is in
favour of testing on animals.
Many will say that this is fair enough (at least the man finally has an opinion), and that you’re either “with them or against them”, but surely you don’t need to be in favour of digging up scientists’ grannies to feel it might be worth at least investigating whether in this day and age experimenting on creatures barely related to humans is really worth the effort. Artificially giving bunnies a disease and then “curing” it doesn’t always tell us much, as six men in London recently discovered.
Don’t get me wrong, if I’m sick I’ll take whatever drugs the doctor tells me to and all my sympathy for animals, rightly or wrongly, takes a back seat to the well being of myself and my loved ones. However I just can’t help wondering, has science not progressed far enough so that we can have a better idea what a particular drug will do to a human being without first testing it out on a bunch of other creatures?